Just to restate: the problem with the message is that I don't know what to fix when I get the message. Forgotten animated movie involves encasing things in "gluestick" Specific word to describe someone who is so good that isn't even considered in say a classification In order to avoid solder bridges If the document said "4 ways" at least I would feel a bit more convinced. Is that in correct? More about the author
Sign in to comment Contact GitHub API Training Shop Blog About © 2016 GitHub, Inc. For this reason, scripts are executed in a sandbox and this API cannot abused. It fails in 184.108.40.206 and 220.127.116.11. If it does, we can mostly forget about the patch in #577412: Chrome support Log in or register to post comments Comment #3 Kars-T CreditAttribution: Kars-T commented January 24, 2011 at
Generally, it looks like it's a good idea to avoid unsafeWindow but in this case there's no alternative. Proudly Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group © 1998-2015 mozillaZine All Rights Reserved Skip to content Ignore Learn more Please note that GitHub no longer supports old versions of Firefox. Log in or register to post comments Comment #6 sun CreditAttribution: sun commented January 26, 2011 at 2:40pm Thanks for letting us know! :) However, we still want to investigate whether
I'm not sure if this is an error in the core of jquery, or if it is with html5 upload. Barton 2008-03-24 09:34:28 PDT I'd have to go back and take out the __scope__ to remember all of the issues with evalInSandbox. Reload to refresh your session. The test case is here: http://www.arcamax.com/testcase/ this works: http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org /firefox/nightly/2008/03/2008-03-06-12-mozilla1.8 /firefox-18.104.22.168pre.en-US.win32.installer.exe this fails: http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org /firefox/nightly/2008/03/2008-03-07-03-mozilla1.8 /firefox-22.214.171.124pre.en-US.win32.installer.exe Bryan Previous Message by Thread: Security errors writing to an iframe in a signed script
What does a midi-chlorian look like? I would suggest updating your jQuery-UI code, I don't see major changes that might break your current code that work with 1.8.18. What predictions do you want to make about eIS? Or a possible resolution here is duplicate of Bug 307984, if you think that this error message would point to the error if that bug was fixed.
Is that > in correct? It seems to be related to the use of unsafeWindow. Browse other questions tagged firefox greasemonkey or ask your own question. John: we don't quite understand this comment: // XXXjjb FF3 needs win.__scope__ because we eval in sandbox What about using evalInSandbox necessitates win.__scope__?
Comment 16 John J. When the script is evaluated with content privileges, it doesn't have those privileges, which keeps it (or the web page, happily) from being able to chase __scope__'s links out to things more stack exchange communities company blog Stack Exchange Inbox Reputation and Badges sign up log in tour help Tour Start here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed What would You-Know-Who want with Lily Potter?
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug. Perhaps it is as simple as you say. Comment 13 Brian Crowder 2008-04-11 17:34:51 PDT *** Bug 421583 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Comment 14 John J. click site For example, > http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/nightly/2008-03-28-04-mozilla1.8.0/ > > has builds from March 28, 2008.
But back to the bug at hand, the problem illustrated by this example is clear: it took the two experts in Mozilla to figure out what the error message meant. news.optonline.net [OptimumOnline] by anon257. DWrite+ D3D10 Layers?
This can happen in a surprising number of ways as you can see in the next section. " Which I interpret thus: your problems in getting evalInSandbox to work for all Were students "forced to recite 'Allah is the only God'" in Tennessee public schools? I have a similar problem in a related context. Log in or register to post comments Comment #2 sun CreditAttribution: sun commented January 23, 2011 at 7:53pm Very interesting, wish I'd have known that before.
You have some updating to do. We provide wrappers and functions like evalInSandbox to mitigate the problem, but that doesn't absolve you, as an extension developer, from thinking about security. The message is new and I don't know what to do with it: commandLine.evaluate FAILS: [Exception... "Security Manager vetoed action" nsresult: "0x80570027 (NS_ERROR_XPC_SECURITY_MANAGER_VETO)" location: "JS frame :: chrome://firebug/content/commandLine.js ::
Personal Open source Business Explore Sign up Sign in Pricing Blog Support Search GitHub This repository Watch 14 Star 142 Fork 65 mihaild/jquery-html5-upload Code Issues 2 Pull requests 0 Projects Comments Comment #1 SepehrLajevardi CreditAttribution: SepehrLajevardi commented January 23, 2011 at 6:11pm I confirm, same here. Further, you seem to be of the mind that "if evalInSandbox doesn't magically fix all of my problems, then it's not worth using it at all." evalInSandbox does provide additional security Publishing images for CSS in DXA HTML Design zip A very strange email Is it possible to keep publishing under my professional (maiden) name, different from my married legal name?
As soon as I insert that line right after the metadata header, the error console throws out a "Security Manager vetoed action" indicating this exact line of code. I have a similar problem in a related context. This does of course not affect the error message being insufficient. If the document said "4 ways" at least I would > feel a bit more convinced.
I'm using Firefox 3.6.10 and the latest Greasemonkey extension.
© Copyright 2017 btcherb.com. All rights reserved.